Appearance
question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Write an article based on this summary: – Yesterday's Esquire opus on the SEAL Team 6 shooter who killed Osama bin Laden, left the Navy after 16 years, and now finds himself unemployed with no pension or health coverage, made waves. And it continues to today, thanks to the assertion by Stars and Stripes that the piece, written by Phil Bronstein, got one thing majorly wrong: "The Shooter," as he is called, is actually "automatically eligible" for five years of health care on the VA's dime, as are all Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans, it reports. The editors of Esquire responded today, by tearing Stars and Stripes' assertion apart. Not only did they fault inaccuracies and trouble spots in the article (for instance, the headline, "Esquire article wrongly claims SEAL who killed bin Laden is denied healthcare," is false, because Bronstein never reported the Shooter was denied it), but they explain that, like many veterans, the Shooter wasn't aware the benefits existed. But the heart of their rebuttal is this: "While the Shooter may be eligible for some direct benefits from the VA, his wife and two children are eligible for nothing. Not to get too deeply into the philosophy of insurance and the distribution of risk, but that means that under the best scenario, the Shooter is 1/4 covered, which of course means that he is not covered at all. It would be like having a 1/4 roof during a storm. Your house still fills with water." Click for the Stars and Stripes article and Esquire's response.
answer:Title: The Controversy Surrounding the Healthcare Coverage of the SEAL Team 6 Shooter Introduction In the aftermath of the Esquire opus article featuring the SEAL Team 6 shooter responsible for killing Osama bin Laden, a controversy has arisen regarding the benefits and healthcare coverage of the unnamed individual. The article painted a picture of the Navy SEAL leaving the force after 16 years without a pension or adequate healthcare coverage, leaving him and his family exposed to potential risks. Following the publication, Stars and Stripes reported that the Esquire article contained incorrect information, claiming that "The Shooter" is automatically qualified for five years of health care benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Esquire's editors have since responded, defending the accuracy of the article and criticizing Stars and Stripes' assertions. The Dispute Between Esquire and Stars and Stripes Esquire's editors pointed out several inaccuracies and trouble spots in Stars and Stripes' article, one of which was the headline, "Esquire article wrongly claims SEAL who killed bin Laden is denied healthcare." Esquire's article, written by Phil Bronstein, did not actually report that the Shooter was denied healthcare benefits. Instead, the article suggested that the SEAL Team 6 member, like many veterans, was not aware of his eligibility for VA benefits. Family Coverage Concerns Esquire's editors primarily focused their defense on the limitations of the Shooter's benefits, emphasizing that while the Shooter may be eligible for some direct benefits, his wife and children are not provided for. They explained that this leaves the family's health care situation largely unresolved, stating, "While the Shooter may be eligible for some direct benefits from the VA, his wife and two children are eligible for nothing… under the best scenario, the Shooter is 1/4 covered, which of course means that he is not covered at all." Furthermore, the editors drew an analogy regarding this situation to having a "1/4 roof during a storm," in which "your house still fills with water," emphasizing the inadequacy of the healthcare coverage provided to the Shooter and his family. Conclusion The controversy surrounding the healthcare coverage of the SEAL Team 6 shooter responsible for killing Osama bin Laden has prompted a debate over the benefits and support provided to military veterans and their families. While Stars and Stripes has taken issue with Esquire's report, the magazine's editors defend their work and maintain that the shooter's incomplete and insufficient coverage represents a larger issue facing many veterans. As this debate continues, the focus remains on the necessity of comprehensive support and proper information dissemination for military personnel and their families.
question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Sentence 1: The resistance literature often comments on Hitler's amazing luck, or his uncanny ability to sense danger; but the failures of the resistance might be better ascribed to the calculated unluck of the resisters, their own ability to sense danger and step away from it, and their overall minuscule number. Sentence 2: Hitler had amazing luck, according to resistance literature. Pick from: A). yes; B). it is not possible to tell; C). no; Is this second sentence entailed by the first sentence?
answer:A). yes; In the first sentence, it is mentioned that "The resistance literature often comments on Hitler's amazing luck" and the second sentence directly says "Hitler had amazing luck, according to resistance literature." So, the second sentence is included in the first one.
question:You are an AI assistant. You should describe the task and explain your answer. While answering a multiple choice question, first output the correct answer(s). Then explain why other answers are wrong. You might need to use additional knowledge to answer the question. Write the next sentence in the following story. How to get into film school Explore the many possible tracks. Film schools typically offer a range of different concentrations, including filmmaking, screenwriting, digital media, animation, scoring, television, and film criticism. Figure out what your primary interest is early so you can find a few different schools that offer what you want. Select from: -- Remember, though, that film school loads loads of distractions and competition. Check with your school or the college admissions board to determine what schools are the best for you before you go.; -- First and foremost is that you want to make sure the school in your area (and the one where the subject is held) offers what you want. Otherwise, you won't be able to get into film school.; -- Choosing just one school to apply to is a mistake--you need to have a few schools so that you can feel certain you will get in to one. If you plan on applying to the most selective schools, choose some that are less selective as well to ensure you get in somewhere.; -- Click on the nadibon association's link below: https: // nadibon-partnership-approvs/contact-nadibon / Chose where you want to film. Your options are a hall of fame/award hall, or art gallery.;. The answer should be
answer:Choosing just one school to apply to is a mistake--you need to have a few schools so that you can feel certain you will get in to one. If you plan on applying to the most selective schools, choose some that are less selective as well to ensure you get in somewhere. The first option focuses on distractions and competition, which are not directly related to the process of selecting a suitable film school. The second option is incorrect because it emphasizes location rather than the specific programs or courses offered by the school. The fourth option is unrelated to the topic of getting into film school, as it seems to pertain to selecting a filming location and is also written unclearly.
question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Write the next sentence. Studying philosophy was easier for Jessica than Maria, since Pick from: * Jessica had always thought long and hard about abstract concepts.; * Maria had always thought long and hard about abstract concepts.;
answer:Studying philosophy was easier for Jessica than Maria, since Jessica had always thought long and hard about abstract concepts. From a young age, she had been fascinated by the nature of existence, the origins of morality, and the intricacies of the human mind. This inherent curiosity led her to explore various philosophical theories and ideas, such as those presented by Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, and Kant. Over the years, Jessica honed her critical thinking skills and the ability to analyze and evaluate different viewpoints. This background in philosophy enabled her to delve deeper into complex subjects and engage in conversations with unique perspectives. Additionally, her love for reading and research made it easier for her to navigate through the abstract and dense philosophical texts that are required to understand these concepts fully. On the other hand, Maria found studying philosophy more challenging, as she had always been more inclined toward practical subjects and tasks. Having a background in science and mathematics, Maria preferred dealing with concrete and quantifiable problems. She often struggled to understand the essence of philosophical discussions, finding it difficult to see the relevance and application of these concepts in everyday life. Despite these differences, Maria acknowledged the importance of philosophy and was determined to learn from Jessica's expertise. As they studied together, Jessica patiently explained the nuances of various philosophical theories, while Maria shared her perspectives on how these ideas could be linked to the real world and practical situations. Over time, Maria began to appreciate the value of philosophy in nurturing a broader understanding of the world and its complexities. Through this collaborative learning process, both Jessica and Maria expanded their worldviews and developed a deeper respect for each other's unique strengths and passions. In conclusion, studying philosophy was easier for Jessica than Maria because Jessica had always been captivated by abstract concepts, and her experience allowed her to navigate through the challenges of philosophical discourse effortlessly. However, the combined efforts of both Jessica and Maria led them to gain valuable insights from their different perspectives, ultimately enriching their overall understanding and appreciation of philosophy as a discipline.